Gay Marriage Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Gay jointure - Research Paper ExampleIt also questions various ethical, social, cultural, and in fact, physical or naturally-occurring norms. In the durable run, these problems and conceptual disagreement may pose great negative impacts on the generations to come. The cynical effects of allowing light marriages are so diverse that it will not be appropriate to overlook them. This paper is an hear to unveil those significant matters, conceptual deviations and complications that this issue entails. To derive a fair conclusion, the thesis will be evaluated on numerous notable aspects affiliated with homosexualism. Gay marriage is an unnatural union Michael Levin, a celebrated author and professor of psychology at City University of New York, stated that Homosexual activists are uncomplete to genetic explanations and hostile to Freudian environmentalism (Levin 235). The point cannot be denied that the relationship shared by gays is unnatural and defies the laws of disposition to procreate, which produces profound impact on their family and a question mark on socially accepted sexual activity roles. Gay Marriage refers to the union of two homosexual males who are unsure about their sexual penchant and decide to receive social acceptance for their relationship through a legal agreement. The unsettlement or scruple of their sexual orientation is caused by numerous factors such as biological, but societal interferences and early-childhood experiences greatly form a persons sexual preferences afterwards. Hence, it can be stated that not all homosexuals are born with this shape of inclination, and it is not always genetic. (Barlow and Durand 351) Furthermore, even if it is genetic, it is curable through modern therapeutic techniques. Clinicians evidently agree that it is realistic for a person to be homosexual at one period of his life and heterosexual at another, revealed Levin (235). What makes the homosexual urge unnatural is that procreation is the main task God created mankind for, and only that put to work can be termed as natural which functions the way it has been designed for (McDowell 1201). If homosexuality prevails, encouraged and promoted in society, and so the very essence of life gets betrayed, and the world will be exempt of life in no time. Moreover, homosexuality cannot be included in the natural category since it upholds personal pleasure, and homosexuals can be referred to as people caring less about society and only about their satisfaction. Patrick Buchanan rightly proclaims that the poor homosexuals- they harbor declared war upon nature, and now nature is exacting an awful retribution (Wells 259). Moreover, unlike lesbians, gays cannot even hold artificial methods for the sake of procreation. Ryan Normandin, editor of The Tech, researched about this aspect and concluded that Same-sex couples are unable to procreate, meaning that thither is no compelling interest to subsidize their marriages (5). There is an important point for governments to understand in this statement. That is, when supporters of homosexuality propagate that attainment of enhanced happiness should be the central focus of allowing gay marriage it gives stick up to the debate on subsidizing everything that promotes happiness. It can be anything, from a simple item like chocolate to human-pet marriage, incest, miscarriage or even brother-sister marriage. Homosexuality is a psychological