Media Combativness :: essays research papers

The human race has sound more(prenominal) combative in the last 30 years (maybe people have bury how wars, and feuds start). The stuff we see on the television, in the papers, and magazines has chanced vastly since the Vietnam War. Prior to that deviation you did not see the under progress toed side of human nature. I step that as time has went on we have come to expect the maneuver that are used during election years. I see it more and more at a young age we are learning to be arugmentive, for example a toddler will argue that he/she doesnt urgency to go to bed and parents argue with them to get them to do what they want them to do, or will give in to their demands. Maybe this has accelerated the combativeness in our nature. We learn at a young age that we consider to argue to get our mode or to have that chanceing of egotism importance. Now I am not saying that we should all become submissive, if we feel strongly about an issue that is great we can propound this in a w ay that is not combative. On the other hand we need to learn to see the others persons thought for what they are, not that we are correct and they are wrong. Ok a prime example of the media using their return to encourage this trend is the infamous presidential blow job. Now the way I see it that should have been a matter overcompensate amongst the man and his wife, not on the nightly news. I still feel that Mr. Clintons actions, while not the best course of action for his marriage on his part, but it was not a matter that affected the way he ran the country or performed his duty to the people he represented. Did the media make that a great deal of a stink over J.F.KS roll in the convert with Miss Monroe? No, why because it was a matter to be handle between the man and his wife, and the times were different because. Things went down hill when the government allowed the media to roll up the Vietnam war without the same rules and guide lines that were in place during the previ ous wars. Since then we have had Watergate, which yes was an illegal act, but was it a matter to be handle in the press?